I think there's a kernel of truth in some of his points, which is, however, entirely

insufficient to justify the slapping-it-on-with-a-trowel he's doing. But that's just me policing his tone. Justifiably, IMO, 'cos the tone there is trolly and deliberately provocative.

But he does make some points I agree with. And some I don't. I wish there was more nuance, and understanding of nuance. In general. Everywhere.

Posted By: Arizona Bay, Aug 18, 09:56:05