But a legitimate reason for keeping him over Naismith nonetheless

I think the *concern* is really that because Naismith cost a few quid and was a marquee signing, we'll continue to feel obliged to play him even though he is clearly dogs**t.

Hopefully he will come good but if not, would like to think he isn't given too long to mooch about and get paid from the bench.

Posted By: CauldRon, May 2, 08:52:58