They have financial clout but that club seems rooten from top to bottom.
We are unique with our owners which can be seen as a good or a bad think. I personally think with our owners and limited funds we would be better off splashing out on a serious manager and coaching stuff rather than keep spunking cash on average/unknown players. The biggest issue with this though is would a high profile manager come to us and that is probably where my argument falls down.
Having said that Neil's staggering lack of experience makes even the other rookie managers Howe etc look like wise old heads. If you look at it in business terms would any company with over 100 million turnover let a person with only 4 months experience in remotely the same industry run the business?
Posted By: happy clappy hughes, Mar 7, 07:36:22
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025