Whole thing is a little strange

Tony Hall seems to be implying he was sacked because his evidence to the investigation was not as full as one would expect. In essence it seems to be a case of others saying he was interviewed about it 45 years ago whilst he has denied being interviewed in the manner the report suggested happened. Hardly seems the basis to sack someone.

He's certainly not been proven to have done anything illegal with the girl who made allegations all those years ago yet that is now mud that will stick because of this sacking.

Posted By: Jim, Feb 25, 13:28:14