I like how that article

has not just one, but two different pictures of the entrance to Southwark Crown Court, plus one random Panda, none of which are actually pertinent to the case in question, since he didn't break into Southwark Crown Counrt, and didn't see an actual Panda.

Clearly, as you intimate, the author of the article is a Wrather.

Posted By: NJ_Canary, Dec 4, 17:13:07