that's true - but I think he only stopped it three times for non-head injuries

twice when we had possession at a slow tempo in our own half - it wasn't as though he interrupted us when we were putting them under heavy pressure. The other time, was when their keeper had it, and would have just thrown the ball out of play to get treatment if the ref hadn't stopped it.

It seems pretty unfair to take out the frustration caused by losing, and some time-waasting by Middlesbrough, on the ref - who added more than enough time on and didn't make any really bad decisions against us.

Posted By: Mecagoenti, Apr 18, 11:14:58