hang on

you're describing Brandonio as a cheap tabloid hack when your main argument against him re Boycott is parotted from someone else's opinion piece which selectively quotes a long and intricate court process, without the context behind the quote?

He lost his appeal against his conviction. Whether those particular appeal court judges had a high opinion of Moore or not, the process (with three hearings) still didn't agree that he was innocent. I'm presuming, by your confidence in his innocence, that you've actually looked into the case, read the decisions and medical evidence etc, and not just relied on third hand media reports?

If you're happy to blindly defame the French judicial process by claiming Boycott was simply a victim of not being able to speak the language (that's why you hire local lawyers) that's fine - but it's the sort of thing a cheap tabloid hack does.

Posted By: CWC, Mar 18, 10:00:35