I think the big difference is that

in Hughton's run the players were clearly performing and getting results way above their ability, against much better players. It was never going to last.

The run under Adams was probably only slightly above par given our squad. And is also what we need to do a lot more of if we want to finish in the top 2.

So I don't think you can compare the two. Also, we don't know yet if that was a good run, or if that was the normal level under Adams (and that we are just on a bad run now).

Posted By: Mecagoenti, Nov 5, 13:39:40