Well I said it in my first post

I don't think there is any need to post child abuse/porn search terms, particularly in a message title which anyone of any age could see. I think it would simply be *better* if you hadn't done that. Not for the first time in this thread, you're putting words in my mouth, this time by suggesting 'outrage'. I'm not outraged at all.

However I simply don't understant how someone so stridently opposed to even posting links to the Daily Mail, doesnt't bat an eyelid at the thought of sharing revolting, child abuse search terms. I've no idea why you would want to do that.

And if you're asking me what is wrong 'with reading those words together' then you are reducing your argument to an utterly absurd level where apparently no language or form of words, broadcast on the internet can conceivably cause offence.

If you think it's perfectly ok to post 'Teeny Tiny Girlfriend' and 'Little Vaginas' then I suppose it must be ok (without the asterisks) to post p**i, n***er, c**n in message titles - because someone else said it of course?

If one wobbly person on here decides to google 'Little Vaginas' having seen you post it, then that is one person too many and their life goes to a dark place.

Why do it? Why actually post their words? To what end? To whose benefit?

Just plain odd.

Posted By: norway, Jul 4, 14:16:35