I'm only questioning your claim yesterday to be a "relative new-comer"

and your observations that "I have to say that 'Pants' chap has issues."

History shows that you've contributed more off than on since 2005, and it wasn't really until 15 months or so ago that you have contributed more frequently. So your explanation is entirely plausible, and without question from that point of view.

It's just that your claim yesterday was a little naughty IMHO, and used to stir the pot with a whacking great wooden spoon. Surely if you remember PK from 2007... User Posted Link (hard to forget) you'd likely remember that 'Pants' chap too?

Just saying.

Posted By: Jim Nasium, Jun 29, 16:42:55