I think everyone thinks they're on thier uppers because of the Not Playing Darren Bent thi

ng. Which supposes that he actually did have an appearances based fee clause he was about to hit, and that that was why he wasnt playing. Neither of which might be true, unless there's been some confirmation of either.

So it's a bit of a reach on that basis. Whether there's more to it than that I don't know.

Posted By: Arizona Bay, Jan 10, 14:00:29