The point I'm making is also quite clear.
Who does Billy Steele think he should have put on in Hooper's place to change things?
For that substitution, CH was perfectly correct in making the change he did. Thus, it cannot be, and should not be, used as a stick to beat him with...
Anyone would think he's got an agenda...oh.
Posted By: Arganth, Dec 28, 23:51:54
Follow Ups
- In response to that..
Posted By: BillySteele, Dec 28, 23:58:31 - 2You have to ignore the Hooper substitution
Posted By: norway, Dec 28, 23:58:04 - 1double sub I suppose, but can't complain at taking off an injured Hooper
Posted By: phrankin, Dec 28, 23:53:01
Reply to Message
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025