Thanks...

After also reading the other side of the argument, my view falls somewhere in between. As Tomblander states, their proposals are great on paper, but realistically they may not be workable. Making more use of renewables would be a step in the right direction though and one i'd like to see.

I'm sure I read somewhere that the wind and solar options had been dismissed as they didn't provide enough, but that may be standard Government spiel.

Posted By: Delveg, Nov 29, 16:15:53