Not that I care that much but it I guesss it is perceived by many as being some kind of "representitive opinion" which is a bit ironic as almost everyone on here hides behind a pseudonym. Interesting point that there was a dearth of "editorials" when we were doing well though. Journalistic standards and all that.
Don't know what's worse, the original editorial, the original editorial being amended as a result of being influenced by opinion (twice); people thinking that the club take it seriously or that the club in fact do take it seriously.
Posted By: Tomblander, Nov 29, 10:13:12
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025