Again, you ignore the fact that Lambert took over a side that finished with 38 points

and Hughton took over a side that finished with 47 points.

That Villa squad needed a complete rebuilding job, it was horrible at the end of McCleish's tenure due to years of Lerner selling off Villa's best players.

Both have had a similar net spend since then, but Villa have progressed whereas we seem to have regressed.

I don't think that Lambert is god, but he's certainly better than Hughton and I'm tired of these silly comparisons which gloss over reality.

This is not me saying Hughton's s**t, but it becomes annoying when people try to (wrongly) compare Lambert in order to justify Hughton's failings.

Posted By: Common Sense Police, Dec 5, 01:12:04