they have indeed filled paragraph after paragraph

unfortunately those paragraphs are all exactly the same i.e. making the anti-Hughton argument and that alone as though it was a matter of fact. What I have never seen is any hint that they have even considered any other possible reasons for our plight or our approach, or the possibility that we might be worse off if we had doen things differently. It's like a religious dogma, where they see everything in terms of what you want to see.

Their argument is there to made, as are all arguments, but all I see is 'we play defensive football therefore Hughton is to blame for all our problems' as though it was an unarguable fact.

But it is a very arguable fact because there are a lot of factors involved and nobody (certainly not me) really knows the answer. So lets stop pretending we do.

Posted By: mr carra, May 7, 13:18:24