Did you even read what I wrote?

"Our defence was particularly dire and clearly needed strengthening", hence why I said that the board backed him by letting him sign those players, that's what we needed.

However, it was Hoot's choice to ruin the momentum system that we had built over three years my making a squad full of attacking players play negative football.

The biggest thing that those players thrived on was movement, which Lambert always encouraged. That has been killed this season.

The point of deserving funds is why should we let a manager spend great money on strikers when he has shown that he can't get us to create chances/attack?

Posted By: Common Sense Police, Apr 27, 19:32:21