To call someone a do-gooder is not a compliment, because "do-gooder" has come to mean NOT simply "someone who does good", but to have a whole bundle of pejorative overtones associated with it - naive, busy-body, interfering, self-righteous, misguided etc etc
OED online - "a well-meaning but unrealistic or interfering philanthropist or reformer. "
So it's not really a good point to criticise someone for using "do-gooder" as a term of abuse, because rather sadly that is exactly what it has become
I blame Dickens for ridiculing Mrs Jellyby
Posted By: Old Git, Mar 1, 11:38:23
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025