Oh God! I totally agree..

Hucks is a better player than Abbey and would never dream of suggesting otherwise. I was jut commenting that Hucks is slightly (though its true there isn't much in it) lazier. Hucks pace brings assets that when everything is going right (as in 2003/4) can clearly overcome the many negatives he brings. Unfortuantely since that season I fear the negatives he brings have outweighed the positives. We have NEVER looked solid defensively with him wide left but he looks lost if we play him anywhere else. He deserves to remain a City legend for that one season alone but I think that currently his presence is probably detrimental to the development of the team since everything has to be shaped around him.

Posted By: mr carra, Oct 28, 09:21:48