Agree totally...

yes a 6-0 loss was bad, but I never saw the Fulham thing as this capitulation that everyone seems to rant on about. Like you said, we should have been 3-2 up at ht and not having to throw men forward chasing the game and leaving ourselves even more exposed than usual at the back.

Far worse was the fact we needed to win in the first place. I'm angry that we played tactically naive football all year, and didn't pick our best team until it was too late. I'm livid with Worthy that since we released Rivers we haven't had a right sided midfielder, and even Rivvo has argued at times that he's a striker not winger anyway. I'm livid that we released/sold all but one of our midfielders in the offseason without any plan on how to replace them. Am I the only one who'd rather see Phil Mulryne or Gary Holt, for all their faults, in there instead of Charlton?

Posted By: NJ_Canary, Oct 25, 17:56:28