Why are we paying ?2m for Hughton....
but the number for Lambert is only ?1m, (or nothing, if you believe those stories, which I don't).
Seems a bit odd to me - surely Lambert should cost a lot more than Hughton - that or the ?2m quoted for Hughton is bulls**t.
Posted By: SimonOTBC, Jun 7, 10:02:39
Follow Ups
- 2lambert was only on a one year rolling contract, Hughton is on a longer contract
Posted By: Tony Martin, Jun 7, 10:22:26 - 1Because Lambert is gone and if we want the Hoot we've gotta pay the loot.
Posted By: Waddockhunt, Jun 7, 10:07:40 - i was going to ask that, i assume it's a clause in his contract?
Posted By: protheroe fitzgibbon, Jun 7, 10:06:19 - 1I wouldn't worry about it, unlikely we'll ever know true figures or why.
Posted By: megson, Jun 7, 10:05:24 - 1isn't the ?2m for him and all his backroom staff as well?
Posted By: d32by, Jun 7, 10:04:43
Reply to Message
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025