to be fair

he can't say "last night i thought we were as good as chelsea for 70-75 minutes" as we didn't play them! He means we matched them, and for long periods we did. We went to pieces after a pure fluke of a second goal. That IS NW's responsibility and he deserves criticism for that. As he does for playing our 2nd choice left back in midfield, when our 1st choice left back is injured, leaving a specialised centre half (who improved as the game went on sat I thought) on the bench.
Also Luton are 3rd after a decent number of games so matching the team third in the league, not far behind an auto spot is not a bad thing.

Don't get me wrong I'm not happy after last night, but lets do ourselves a favour and keep criticism fair and well thought out, it?s the only way the board will react and take it seriously. Vitriol will just be ignored. Well reasoned arguments carry more weight.

Posted By: megson, Oct 19, 08:57:06