Its the fault of the Jury.........

(all aboad my Tilt boat!)

Totally expected overeaction.

Makes me wonder about some people.

I love how people who were not in court and did not hear the evidence presented, can pass such an opinion.

Just bizarre.

The facts are the instructions of guilt were that the juror needed to be pretty much 100% sure on all counts, not just beyond a reasonable doubt (US standard)

The fact is the decision was unanimous for both people on all counts suggests there were enough doubts to not be certain they were guilty.

The jury probably reached the correct verdict based on evidence and legal instruction.

They could still personally think Harry was guilty but still have to give a not guilty based on instruction.

Not sure how its the juries fault for doing an honest job.

Posted By: usacanary, Feb 8, 16:52:21