absolutely

which is to a great degree due to the length of time it's taken to get sorted.

not sure what the answer is there though.

should he have actually have been innocent then it would've been right that he was allowed to have raced during the period that the appeal was on-going

perhaps they could take a leaf out of the FA's book with their additonal bans for spurious appeals?

Posted By: Ralf Scrampton, Feb 6, 15:34:32