Wasn't my argument, you brought it up originally

that they were doing worse under Pearson. They clearly aren't. Also when did I say they were a top champs side? I said they had a good squad and are HARD TO BEAT. Never once did I make them out to be a high quality side, never once did I say that they've made 'vast' improvements, just that Pearson has made improvements to the side and that in turn has made them a lot harder to beat.

I say a team is fulfilling their potential under a new manager and are becoming tough to beat, therefore our cup game with them won't be easy and COULD go to a replay, because, once again, they are hard to beat. You translate this to mean I think Leicester are brilliant, full of quality and might turn us over. Far reaching much?

You say my points are weak (they're not, they're facts), yet you're mainly arguing against a point that I didn't even make! I suggest you look through my posts again as you have made a major misunderstanding. I like you USAC, but you're are totally missing the point. If I said that it was as tough to beat Stoke as it was to beat Arsenal, would that mean that Stoke had as much quality as Arsenal and should be as high in the league? Of course not, but they're still as hard to beat.

My whole point is that Leicester are tough to beat and this tie could go to a replay, that's it. There's nothing more to it than that.

Posted By: Common Sense Police, Jan 29, 20:35:12