Based on what i've seen so far (which admittedly is only the prosecution case) I

don't see how he can get off. His defence seems to be pleading stupidity or that it was some kind of oversight but there are so many contradictions between him and Mandaric and so many statements "on the public record" that seem to undermine his please of ignorance.

he basically seems to be saying he cant write, use a computer or a mobile phone. You would think it would be quite easy for someone to prove or disprove that one way or another!

If he is guilty surely no way he can get the England job.

Posted By: Jim, Jan 26, 22:55:48