However, Mr Suarez was not as impressive a witness as Mr Evra.

His answers were not
always clear or directly addressed to the question. We give one example in paragraph 246
below. Whether this was due to language difficulties or evasiveness was not entirely clear
and so, whenever we could, we gave Mr Suarez the benefit of the doubt. We were
certainly more concerned by the substance of his evidence (as explained below) than by
the manner in which he gave it.

Posted By: norway, Dec 31, 17:30:41