Obviously i'm not in court so not party to all the evidence but..

but from what i've read in the papers the specific evidence all sounds a bit thin to me. Clearly the police think these guys (plus the others I assume but they don't have the dna evidence) did it and are desperate to nail them for it but from the details of the prosecution case I saw I would think a decent QC ought to be able to get them off, at least in relation to a charge of murder.

Be interesting to see how it ends up.

Posted By: Jim, Nov 17, 13:35:51