Board poll: let's pretend that Goal Line Technology is being introduced
It is agreed that there will still be circumstances wherein definite proof can't be achieved (people in the way etc). Would you prefer the FA to give the benefit of the doubt to the attack or the defence?
For me, it'd be the attack, unless The Nodge were the defence, but I can see the argument for the reverse.
Posted By: Sugbad The Bad, Apr 30, 18:43:35
Follow Ups
- Would probably agree with the hawk eye system
Posted By: pants, Apr 30, 19:24:29 - 3its not a goal unless you know it 100% crossed the line. therefore still not a goal
Posted By: Tony Martin, Apr 30, 18:49:58 - the technology would decide if it's over
Posted By: 1 5CC, Apr 30, 18:46:51 - Would have to be the defence if any doubt.
Posted By: JD3, Apr 30, 18:46:20
Reply to Message
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025