Loans are strange..........

With Cody it was obviously part of the jackson deal but from what is coming out of the Gills camp....... it wasnt a loan/permanent deal.

With Lansbury loan its obvious weare just grooming him for arsenal and have zero chance of singing him unless (a) we get promoted (b) Arsenal win the champions Lg so feel they dont need him.

With Barnett its hard to tell if there wasnt an agreement in place....... ie Loan/permanent....better known as an "under the table" transfer outside the window.

Same with Edwards? Is he surplus or is it just a short term loan?

Posted By: usacanary, Feb 21, 18:21:48