For me, we only spent 5m on transfer fees, and even then the 3m for Ashton, was implied

to be because of Watling

Like Git says, before you get there it's all 30m this (90m now), but when we got there, we didn't seem to really spend any of it

Then when we came down, like you say, in came to total pants players that lead us to the path of 2009

Posted By: pants, Jan 19, 10:24:33