Re: Martin Peters, Lansbury Debate.

After a night of good sleep, I have something, just discuss. You have some good points but I would like to say mine first. It's not official but every top teams, even us send Francomb to Barnet, there should be "special rules" or agreement about the club need to play him because he need match (of course if you look at Barnet's lines up, Francomb not even on the bench and not sure injury or not) fitness. Lansbury back in training a few weeks but consider our form against QPR and Boro, I would not see any reasons why Lappin and Smith will be "dropped" after those performance? We are in good forms and no need to change your team -- especially that kinds of agreement doing the amendment. I point out from the start of the season about we have no pace up front, and Lansbury's addition will not improved.

About your views, I have to admit Lansbury definitely a much better player than Lappin and Smith, technically for sure, especially for his views of passing and Holt's 2nd goal against SCUM says it all. I absolutely agree with you our bench is much stronger than last season, I will still take Lansbury on loan until the end of the season, if the selection will determine by recent forms, training and match performance, but not by the special rules I mentioned above. Performance-wise I could nott think Lansbury deserve a place to start against Sheffield United, especiall when you see after Smith and Lappin come on today, our game atomsphere completely changed, we are more direct with the balls come in on either left or right side, but we'll see the team sheet come around 2:20pm next Saturday.

Posted By: XXL16, Jan 16, 01:48:19