Either I haven't been paying attention or this is the first time I've seen this

"HMRC argued at a two-day hearing on Wednesday and Thursday that the CVA was 'unfair and seriously flawed' as it gave preference to football creditors, including players, who were able to claim up to 100% of monies owed them, while other creditors, including the Revenue, would receive much less."

Quite f**king right! No reason why football creditors should have preference over any others (hope they don't owe us any money...)

Posted By: BerlinCanary, Aug 5, 15:16:22