Have a pop? No, actually.

You see, when people get arsey with him, quoting stuff he has apparently said, a lot of the time it's entirely fictional - created purely to back up the act of having a go at him. And that winds me up. (Although it is fair to say that applies to everyone,not just him)

That you could actually point to a post is sufficient for me to accept that your demeanour is based on something substantial, rather than because of who it is.

But as you say, whether I have pre-conceived attitudes about him that determine whether I read one of his posts differently to others, is irrelevant.

Posted By: Arganth, Jul 18, 15:29:33