needing 326 seats to kick out brown (who was never elected in the first place) seems a farce when you have his own party with massive losses, the lib dems with a very dissapointing result and completely out of what is a clear 2 horse race - and the tories with a huge swing in their favour and the CLEAR winners.
IF you discount wales and scotland, the tories would have enough for a majority anyway in england - and IF thats what counted we wouldnt even be having this debate.
Even if its a coalition between the liberals and labour, why should Brown keepo his job when the majority of individual voters dont want him?
Posted By: Cheltenham_Canary, May 7, 08:28:04
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025