even if our wage bill/player budget went down by 20% it doesn't automatically mean our deb

t wouldn't suddenly have become a problem - not unless all non-wage bill/playing staff costs also went down by 20%

similarly it doesn't follow that because wage bill/playing staff costs are projected to increase by 35% once we are promoted that non-wage bill/playing staff costs will also increase by 35%

therefore it doesn't also automatically mean that an increase in income after promotion of less than 35% (not that i have a clue what that will actually be) and an increase of 35% in wage bill/playing staff costs = an increase in debt

Posted By: Ralf Scrampton, Feb 17, 17:22:52