Darragh MacAnthony

User Posted Link

?The tribunal were appalled to hear of the Company?s misleading business practices, including unfulfilled promises of guaranteed rental returns and misleading descriptions of the facilities that would be available to owners.

The Company accepted deposits for unbuilt and unidentified properties. In some cases a purchase price was not included in the documentation provided to buyers. These problems were compounded by the Company?s poor service, including their reluctance to resolve grievances after sales had been agreed

Despite these omissions, the Company?s position is that there is no right of cancellation by buyers, and therefore their deposits have not been returned to them. As a result members of the public have lost considerable sums of money resulting from false and enticing statements made by the Company.?

What a delightful chap.

Posted By: thebigfeller, Jan 26, 14:57:21