You've thrown in a vague example, which leaves any reader of your post to go down various avenues of thought (which was your intent)
And you're actually validating and reassuring yourself about the way you are by irrelevantly attaching yourself to someone elses argument on here
Yet you probably didn't think of that with you pressed submit
Everyone on here is as stubborn as the next. Everyone has a list of times they've felt wronged on here and it hasn't been sorted out. Everyone at some point on here has attempted to sort out those wrongs and the situation become worse because it's caused another argument
With that in mind, and me admitting that I'm as bad as usacanary at times
What makes you so arrogantly qualified to preach like you have in the original post?
I don't need an answer, it's rhetorical. I guess I'm just irritated by it because it's a regular occurence
I first read your post and thought "is he meaning me, we disagreed about David Bell, it figures doesn't it? We sold him, he's a similar player to wes, they were both injured etc etc"
With the above in mind "Everyone at some point on here has attempted to sort out those wrongs and the situation become worse because it's caused another argument", I just thought we'd end up in another argument
That's if you were meaning me. It's all in your court to tell me it was nothing to do with me, and await the trolls to hack in and go "why is it always about you? god you're so paranoid"
Either way, you were foolish to rake up any argument you had where you felt you were right or you somehow deserve your apology too
That's my answer. It's not going to work out well is it?
Posted By: pants, Jan 15, 12:17:08
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025