I think it's hard to argue with the below reasoning, yet trillions of dollars are already moving in relation to the predictions being made.
"has "climate science? advanced to a ?normal science? or is still in a ?pre-paradigm? state (see Thomas S. Kuhn?s the Structure of Scientific Revolutions User Posted Link If it is in a ?pre-paradigm? state, it has no generally accepted basis for making predictions.
The warmists are claiming, in effect, that their models and data sets constitute a paradigm for climate science and anything outside their paradigm is not climate science.
The problem with that is that there are a large number of scientists publishing papers in different scientific journals questioning their models, data, and predictions ? a clear indication of a pre-paradigm state, according to Kuhn.
Conclusion: Climate science has not matured enough to be able to make acceptable predictions ? certainly not on a global scale over long periods of time.
Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 24, 03:33:30
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025