Was it even put into context?

My entire beef was with the third-person s**t. I take it Stan's not given that up? The readable bits of the previous article were pretty good but I've given up on Waghorn's site. Its a shame as he was in early with Lambert while everyone else spaffed on about Adkins but I just can't read the luv-a-duck, back of fag packet, isn't it?, slam in, bolt on, isn't it?, down in darkest Kent nonsense that pervades the site.

Posted By: sheffieldcanary, Aug 27, 12:56:32