John Tilson makes no sense IMHO.

(my reply elsewhere)

The whole interview is inconsistent.............

He slams the board for what they have done in the past............. so they bring in a lot of new faces, interestingly people who have disagreed with the board in the past.................. then slams them.

Make up your mind! Do you want change or not?

Another example is asking WHY Mr Bowkett and Mr Bertram said in their statement in May....... " at this time we have no interest in being on the board"

YET.........(drum roll) HE (Mr Tilson) makes EXACTLY the same statement in his interview.............. (NCISA/ME are not interested in being on the board)

They made the statement for EXACTLY the same reason Mr Tilson made it..........To justify their statements in a context of........... no ulterior motive behind it.

The truth is ANYONE who releases a statement to the press has an agenda....... thats the whole point.

I think Mr Tilson's complaints about the quality of the squad are laughable........... in the context that NCISA supported meassures which would lower the first team budget.

Why didn't the interviewer ask him about that?

After the text slamming him, his reply that he acts on a "December membership questionaire" is head scratching?

How can the interviewer not catch that? How does THAT relate to current events?????

At this point its hard to tell if NCISA in the media is actually speaking for the group/fans or it's just John Tilson's personal opinions without consultation from the members. (are polls/votes ever taken before press releases/interviews?)

It's OK for John Tilson to question the impartality/integrity of the leadership of Archant but I am sure it's not OK to question the leadership of NCISA.

I don't expect any of the NCISA supporters to address any of the inconsistencies in Mr Tilsons Interview.

I do expect personal abuse not dealing with or having any relationship with any of the points I raise.

Posted By: usacanary, Jul 5, 20:11:42