actually no, scrub that, y'mean we'd have a small say in who might represent our views

rather than a small say in the decisions taken by vote at the AGM

anyway, who says we'd end up with someone we could trust?

the club is already owned by 2 well-meaning fans, who despite f**king things do have successful business careers behind them, why would we want another well-meaning fan who in all likelihood wouldn't even have that qualification?

a fan on the board would achieve the squareroot of f**k all, they would be an irrelevence and a distraction

Posted By: Ralf Scrampton, Jun 29, 17:30:36