The fact that Mumby and Doncaster were sacked is pretty strong indication that the board knows how the fans feel and are trying to make changes.
Your assertion that because there was a mass vote at the meeting, that is how most fans feel is silly.
If most fans felt like that you would have had FAR more people at the meeting in the first place.
As an example Norwich plays Reading at carrow road.
If we polled random people leaving the ground.
Who do you like Norwich or Reading?
Obviously over 95% will favor Norwich
Do the same thing at Reading's ground and 90% will favor Reading.
Can you not see the meeting had a biased sample?
Most people came to the meeting after it was annouced as a "call to arms" against the board.
If people dont like the board then naturally they wont like any of the decisions they make such as appointing Gunn.
Posted By: usacanary, May 15, 17:47:24
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025