The meeting tonight.

Kind of obvious but what is the point of votes against Gunn or the board.

Obviously the reason the vast majority have gone in the first place is because they are unhappy with the board and its apointment of Gunn.

The vote is heavilly biased, if they claim anything else.

My feeling is about 30% are unhappy with Gunn as manager, 50% are in the middle/wait and see and 20% think its a good appointment.

I am in the middle 50% FWIW, I have some serious doubts but I dont think its a horrible appointment.

As for the board, not sure what they want apart from Delia and MWJ leaving.
I actually think they would leave if the were made a decent offer................

I think this meeting would be better spending time on what they can do in the future, such as getting a person on the board who can influence the future direction of the club or at least putting the brakes on s**tty ideas that pop up.

Posted By: usacanary, May 14, 21:50:37