Listening to the board it's obvious they are going to give Gunn a new contract

All I have heard from Munby, delia and Doncaster is that Gunny is lovely and we know him and he cares and it wasnt his fault at all. Doncaster said that the players clearly played for Gunn apart from yesterday.

Munby said that Gunn wants the job and cares and that this counts for a lot in his book. I'm sorry but that is absolute s**t. I want the job and care but that doesnt make a candidate.

What should count is how good a manager you are not if you bleed yellow and f**king green. Roeder and Grant need to take a huge amount of blame here but Gunny should shoulder a fair bit too.

He clearly hasnt been good enough and for me we were doomed when he decided to break up the gow/mooney partnership. We finally had 2 strikers who appeared to have formed some sort of partnership and then we move our best striker to the wing.

When we have been behind in games Gunn just takes too long to do anything about it. For me he just doesnt have the intuition that top managers have and he seems to follow the game rather then lead it. He is passionate and loves the club but so what.

I hate all this s**t about needing someone who gets norwich and norfolk. Lets get a manager who understands fans but I dont care where he comes from and what his history is.

The problem with the board for me is that they are starry eyed fans and when gunny speaks they just melt and think "good old bryan, he loves the club and is far better than any other manager. He told us so himself"

Please, please please please do not let this man anywhere near the playing side of our club.

When Gunny was appointed manager we were a club 2 points above the relegaion zone and we ended up 5 points below.

I loved him as a player but lets not confuse that with good football sense.

Posted By: earlydoors, May 4, 17:51:58