But logic tell me...

Which is the safer bet?

Go with the "suck it and see" approach with Gunn and co in the HOPE that he might turn out to be ok or go for a manager with experience and some degree of success?

This board tried the inexperienced route with Grant and it failed, they also tried the experienced with a crap record in Roeder route and that failed.

Now perhaps they should try what they should have done all along in the experienced and had some success route.

I just cannot beleive that they have not done this and still some fans beleive that going with Gunn is a better option.

Posted By: jimbo, Apr 23, 10:13:43