I actually think what the FA are doing for once is correct. A thorough investigation into

whether or not the reason for the holding companies demise was due to the football club. I imagine though the sticking point will be the stadium. If the stadium has caused the debt and because it's not owned by SFC but the holding company then they get away with no 10 point reduction, that'll be wrong and the FA can rest easy they've yet again made a wrong decision.

Posted By: stringersrevenge, Apr 14, 11:50:13