WOuld it really be popular with the majority of city fans?

User Posted Link

I'll be honest, i've no real desire to see Hucks playing for us again.
Didn't like the way it ended, but I'm not convinced he'd offer us that much now.
I'd rather remember him for what he did, then have the possibility of seeing him struggle, make little impact, and souring the memory.

If he could fill any role it would possibly be as an impact sub, but would the corwd accept that?
If he hucks was here and didn't start a game we lost, would that always be becuase hucks didn't play? Will people accept a bit part Darren Huckerby?
Can we afford a bit part huckerby on the bench?
If you have Hucks and a keeper on the bench each game, that only leaves 3 sub positions for players to influence the game. Hucks off the bench won't always be the answer, if we are trying to hold a 1-0 lead away, would bringing hucks on be a good move?

I'm very unconvinced about him coming back, I think we'll regret it if he does.

Posted By: megson, Mar 30, 08:48:01