So we shouldn't of signed them?

or we should have signed them on a deal where if any of them leave for any reason even if we make money from said deal we get some of the fee back we paid to the agent?

If sammy goes in the summer we will make back the money we spent on him, hoolahoop and Loopyloop at least, we may even make it back twice over.

I'm not sure that Gilks was worth anything to us, if Blackpool wanted him as a make weight in the deal it was a great f**king deal, we're fine for goalies. And if need be must be we could have got a keeper of gilks' quality from my sunday league on loan.

Posted By: cookpassbabtridge, Mar 5, 12:45:47