Is having a keeper on the bench
A) The sensible and correct thing to do
B) A waste of a sub when you're 2nd bottom
C) Both of the above
Posted By: Darren Eadie, Mar 3, 15:37:44
Follow Ups
- I always think if I played a team with no sub keeper, I'd have my hard man take him out
Posted By: Ralf Scrampton, Mar 3, 15:49:00 - Sorry (:
Posted By: lurd, Mar 3, 15:47:51 - I always think if I played a team with no sub keeper, I'd have my hard man take him out
Posted By: pants, Mar 3, 15:44:37 - 2I always think if I played a team with no sub keeper, I'd have my hard man take him out
Posted By: pants, Mar 3, 15:44:37 - I always think if I played a team with no sub keeper, I'd have my hard man take him out
Posted By: malkybarkid, Mar 3, 15:44:18 - I always think if I played a team with no sub keeper, I'd have my hard man take him out
Posted By: malkybarkid, Mar 3, 15:44:08 - I always think if I played a team with no sub keeper, I'd have my hard man take him out
Posted By: malkybarkid, Mar 3, 15:43:57 - I always think if I played a team with no sub keeper, I'd have my hard man take him out
Posted By: lurd, Mar 3, 15:43:38 - 1I always think if I played a team with no sub keeper, I'd have my hard man take him out
Posted By: lurd, Mar 3, 15:43:38 - 1I always think if I played a team with no sub keeper, I'd have my hard man take him out
Posted By: lurd, Mar 3, 15:43:37 - 1worth two in the bush?
Posted By: malkybarkid, Mar 3, 15:43:12 - 1we struggle to find 11 worthy players for the pitch and extra sub aint going to help so
Posted By: stringersrevenge, Mar 3, 15:42:12
Reply to Message
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025